Create an Account
Forgot your Password?
World of Warcraft
WowRiot
Starcraft 2
Starfeeder
Hellforge
Hellforge
 
Machinima
Myndflame
Darkfall Online
Conquer Agon
Left 4 Dead
Left 4 Dead
 
RazeTheWorld
RazeTheWorld
Quake Live
Quake Life
1337pwn
1337pwn
 
Limit Break
Limit Break
REHorror
Horror Games
Gameriot Store
Buy Games!
The Gameriot Store
POST STUFF
close
New Blog Post
Add a Video
Host an Image
Upload a File
by briyan, Level 45
Last updated at June 16, 2008, 2:29 pm
Following a supposedly successful launch, Funcom's Age of Conan has begun to crumble as the opening-month hype wears off and the criticisms increase.  Today's extremely demanding MMO players are accustomed to a very high standard of gameplay and polish that seems just out of reach for Funcom's new title, and the rapidly declining user base is evidence that this experiment has failed.

The AoC Launch Numbers

While the videogame media tossed around some big numbers at the AoC launch, including a major figure of 700,000 copies, the actual sales numbers were unknown, as Funcom could not/would not report any details beyond what they had shipped to retailers.   Recent inside information, however, has given us more details about what happened to these 700,000 copies of the game.

AoC Sales Performance

That's right, we have a rather unhappy picture as we near the "one month" point for Age of Conan.

* ~40% are still sitting on retailer shelves
* ~30% were bought and returned due to insufficient system reqs
* ~20% were bought and installed but canceled without subscribing
* ~10% were bought and set up a subscription to continue playing

Of the much-hyped 700,000 number, this leaves us with about 70,000 Active Players in the world of Hyboria. 

Missing The Mark By 86%

Is 70,000 players enough of a "critical mass" to sustain community growth and allow the game to maintain a playerbase as time goes on?  Funcom initially estimated that they would need about 500,000 monthly subscriptions for a "break even" point to sustain the game.  The server maintenance costs and massive initial development time on a resource-heavy game like Age of Conan are such that this figure will need to be reached within six months of launch if there is any hope for the game to live on.    One month after release, they have achieved 14% of their goal, and the player base is trending downward.  Not good news for Conan fans.

What Went Wrong?

In assessing the damages, Funcom officials are hesitant to speculate on problems with the game in fear of scaring off even more of their dwindling playerbase, but I will go out on a limb here and make some guesses for the benefit of my readers.

1. Nobody Can Run The Game

This must be a big factor, given that half of the copies that actually sold came right back to the retail store because users could not run the game.  System requirements proved too high to reach beyond the tight-knit group of "hardcore" gamers who spend thousands per year on PC gaming.

2. The World Has No Character

Age of Conan's designers attempted to deliver us a dark, gritty, realism-themed world that ended up feeling derivative, lifeless, and boring.  The legions of gamers who enjoy MMO as an escape into an alternate world found Hyboria devoid of magical excitement, fun, and wonder.

3. World of Warcraft Raised The Bar Too High

After over three years of playing a polished, highly stable product from Blizzard, the masses of new and old MMO fans coming from World of Warcraft to "try something new" were disgusted with the instability of the game client, the poor response of the customer service teams, and the general poor pacing and lack of content offered in Age of Conan.  This level of service may have been OK five years ago, but gamers won't accept it now after they've been spoiled by WoW.

4. Funcom Broke Promises That Never Should Have Been Made

World PvP, large scale outdoor battles, and Guild warfare were all hyped in Age of Conan, but none of it was delivered.  When players took too much control over the world, developers swiftly removed access and implemented lockdown controls to convert the game into a fairy-tale amusement park.

Yet another developer failed to realize that an open-ended large-scale PvP with total freedom is not only technically impossible, but is also not enjoyable for most players.  Games need structure and direction to provide entertainment, even though a few hardcore gamers think they will have more fun without it.  Funcom attempted to bait the hardcore gamers by promising that which they could not deliver, and the hardcore gamers called their bluff.

5. The Game Is Bad

Combat system is bad, world is bad, interface is bad, everything is bad.  This game was built around graphics and an opportunistic release in a lull period for World of Warcraft.  Sales were made and then lost as gamers realized it truly was just a bunch of hype.

Can It Be Fixed?

At this point, Age of Conan appears to be doomed.  Only a tiny fraction of people who tried the game are interested in playing, and Funcom is making changes that alienate more active subscribers each day.   It won't be long before we see more free playtime promotions, refer-a-friend, and deep discounts at the retail level as Age of Conan breathes its dying breath.

The only money to be made at this point is to sell the game box based on the graphics and marketing materials.  With a converted subscription rate of less than 10%, Funcom has to be satisfied with this failed experiment and move on to their next project.

People Would Rather Wait For More WoW

The sad truth that we realize, after this past month, is that speculating and reading about upcoming changes for WoW: WotLK is actually more fun and interesting than playing Age of Conan.

Shame on Funcom, or congrats to Blizzard?  Who knows.  Either way, it's time to say an official "Goodbye" to Age of Conan.


     
276 comments
Nobbeh
Nobbeh Jun 16, 2008 at 2:35 pm
None
None
-2 votes
None
defo number one for me, was looking so forward to playing it but threw in the towel simply because i couldnt run it :(
briyan
briyan Jun 16, 2008 at 2:39 pm
None
None
-3 votes
None
I feel your pain Nobbeh ... the same thing happened to half the people who bought the game.  It's really too bad more people couldn't give it an honest go.
Nobbeh
Nobbeh Jun 16, 2008 at 2:50 pm
None
None
+0 votes
None
All settings were on the lowest of low and it wouldn't run, getting a pc upgrade in the summer for getting good results in my GCSE's.
briyan
briyan Jun 16, 2008 at 3:17 pm
None
None
-3 votes
None
Are you going to try AoC again with the new PC or not even bother?
Nobbeh
Nobbeh Jun 16, 2008 at 3:26 pm
None
None
+2 votes
None
hmmm, not sure. I did like AOC when i was playing it so i might give it a spin, however i'm getting into UT3 again :O!
Godsmak
Godsmak Jun 16, 2008 at 3:46 pm
None
None
+3 votes
None
It's sad a lot of people cannot run AoC. Partly is because everyone has been accustomed to WoW's low-grade system requirements. I think my Nintendo can run WoW.

Regardless, you upgrade your comp and give AoC a try. Don't be a douche and give up like a ***** before lvl 8 (I think Vir got ganked and camped), have some more perseverance and you'll grow to like it more.
Reason
Reason Jun 16, 2008 at 5:56 pm
None
None
+0 votes
None
Godsmak you need to stop being a **** head and immediately labeling everyone that doesn't like the game as *****es and care bears if they don't like it.


THERE IS NOT A SINGLE WoW PLAYER POSTING HERE ON GAMERIOT THAT DOESN'T WANT SOMETHING TO KICK WoW IN THE TEETH AND TAKE OVER. EVERYONE WANTS SOMETHING NEW - UNFORTUNATELY IT HAS NOT ARRIVED!


AoC is not it dude. I tried it - and I'd rather play ShadowBane while waiting for WoW expansion or soemthing to knock BLizzard off the block. It'll happen one day.
Godsmak
Godsmak Jun 16, 2008 at 6:35 pm
None
None
+2 votes
None
AoC isn't perfect, it has **** that drives me nuts. But I would rather play AoC than WoW any ******* day of the week.

AoC > WoW
Kaex
Kaex Jun 16, 2008 at 5:28 pm
None
None
-1 votes
None
Yea, I remember someone claiming they played AoC on a 2 year old system, not only that but on max settings. I instantly called BS on this. AoC demands too good of a computer.
Godsmak
Godsmak Jun 16, 2008 at 6:39 pm
None
None
+2 votes
None
My comps over a year and a half old, E6600 core 2 duo. I've since upgraded to 4 gigs of ram, GeForce 9800 and Vista. Those 3 things are huge for AoC, Vista alone provided faster loading and better performance. I run everything full detail without a stutter.

People need to get the stupid mentality out of their brains that "AoC doesn't run on my comp so I am just going to ***** and complain and quit." Games are constantly being upgraded and the newer games that come out are going to be even more taxing on your comp.
Kaex
Kaex Jun 16, 2008 at 9:54 pm
None
None
+0 votes
None
So you spent roughly 400-500$ to play a game. Sorry not doing that, Yea I'll upgrade my comp soon, but not just to play AoC, it will be because my comp finally can't do what I want it to do.

FYI, AoC runs better on Vista because Vista is DX10. XP doesn't have that and AoC is a DX10 game primarily.
Godsmak
Godsmak Jun 16, 2008 at 10:49 pm
None
None
+2 votes
None
Are you asking me if I spent that much for AoC or making a statement?

Yes I realize that about Vista, thanks doctor
Kaex
Kaex Jun 17, 2008 at 10:07 am
None
None
+1 votes
None
A question mark usually indicates a question.
Godsmak
Godsmak Jun 17, 2008 at 10:49 am
None
None
+2 votes
None
k so your statement was wrong then, gotcha
Thadius
Thadius Jun 17, 2008 at 5:43 am
None
None
+3 votes
None
"FYI, AoC runs better on Vista because Vista is DX10. XP doesn't have that and AoC is a DX10 game primarily."

This is false, because DX10 is not in AoC as of right now.  It won't be implemented until August, sometime.
Kaex
Kaex Jun 17, 2008 at 10:04 am
None
None
+1 votes
None
Rofl, wait so another broken promise? WoW AoC just gets worse and worse. So basically the game is early beta right?
Malcolm
Malcolm Jun 17, 2008 at 10:34 am
None
None
+2 votes
None
Godsmak, this is the first time I've ever seen you post something that wasn't completely retarded. So, first of all, congratulations.

Second of all, I agree with you entirely.

While World of Warcraft has done a lot of PC gaming at a time when it seems to be dying out, it has also hindered the industry. There are a lot of people who want to play PC games who don't know dick about computers. World of Warcraft catered to these people by launching a game with purposely dated graphics in order to lower system requirements and have access to a large playing base. You can play WoW with even the ****tiest of computers dating back several years. This is not the norm for PC gaming.

What we have now is a huge population of gamers who are finally getting tired of WoW, but they have ****ty computers which they haven't ever upgraded because all they've been doing is playing a game with terrible graphics and low system requirements. They are trying to move on to a game with a modern graphics engine and (1) their system cannot handle it at acceptable detail settings, (2) they don't have enough knowledge to properly tweak the game and their system in order to improve performance because they have never had to do so before.
Godsmak
Godsmak Jun 17, 2008 at 10:50 am
None
None
+2 votes
None
95% of GR is retarded, how else can I properly act in this cesspool?
Kaex
Kaex Jun 17, 2008 at 5:08 pm
None
None
+1 votes
None
Your GR account is named after a ****ty band. Please tell us all again how you're mature.
Godsmak
Godsmak Jun 17, 2008 at 6:22 pm
None
None
+2 votes
None
Which band?

Where did I say I was mature?

You're pretty defensive, did you put money into GR?
Kaex
Kaex Jun 18, 2008 at 10:35 am
None
None
+0 votes
None

You're pretty defensive, did you put money into GR?

lol?

And the ****ty band you named your account after bud. Play stupid all you want.
Godsmak
Godsmak Jun 18, 2008 at 11:00 am
None
None
+1 votes
None
You should probably go take a nap and calm your nerves. I didn't mean to rattle you so much.
Kaex
Kaex Jun 18, 2008 at 4:49 pm
None
None
+1 votes
None
Godsmak
Godsmak Jun 18, 2008 at 5:39 pm
None
None
+1 votes
None
oh and btw, the band is "GODSMACK"

I am "THE GODSMAK"

That band had maybe 1 good song, decent name and I have had for years (2001?). Not my FPS name however ;\

XOXOXO
briyan
briyan Jun 18, 2008 at 5:41 pm
None
None
+1 votes
None
Don't forget the Alice in Chains song "God Smack" ... maybe the band took their name from that, not sure.
Kaex
Kaex Jun 19, 2008 at 4:58 pm
None
None
+1 votes
None
Kaex
Kaex Jun 17, 2008 at 5:09 pm
None
None
+1 votes
None
So what you're saying is WoW was smart because they made their game available to the majority of players. Ok got ya.
Malcolm
Malcolm Jun 18, 2008 at 12:57 pm
None
None
+1 votes
None
Wow, you can read. Congratulations.

Smart from the perspective of an individual business, yes. Stupid from the perspective of the industry as a whole.
Kaex
Kaex Jun 18, 2008 at 5:17 pm
None
None
+1 votes
None
How is it hurting the industry? Do you even live in the US where prices for everything go up on a daily basis yet pay doesn't? Many people can't afford to buy a brand new computer regardless of how cheap it would be to buy one to play a game like AoC.
Malcolm
Malcolm Jun 19, 2008 at 1:47 pm
None
None
+1 votes
None
It hurts the industry because it fosters stagnancy in the evolution of gaming, particularly in terms of graphics.

With regards to the cost of a computer: I'm a fairly recent college grad in the US who works in research and therefore makes very little money. I have student loans, a car lease, rent, and all of the other various expenses that people have in a city that has one of the highest costs of living on the planet (New York). And yet I had no trouble buying a new computer last year and I know it's going to last a long time because I did my research. The whole thing came out to roughly a grand, and I won't have to upgrade anything for at least another year, probably two.

And AoC does NOT require a brand new computer.
Kaex
Kaex Jun 19, 2008 at 5:16 pm
None
None
+1 votes
None
I'm sorry, but what is "little money" to you? Car Lease= roughly 250$ a
month, assuming you drive a decent car. Rent in New York is roughly
1,000$ a month assuming you are with at least one roomate I'll say 500$
for you. Right there that's 750$ a month not counting food/gas/student
loans (no way I could guess how much that is per month) and etc.



So I'm guessing you make roughly 400$ a week, or 10$ an hour assuming
full time. 850$ a month is what you would roughly have left over after
rent/Car payments. I'll assume you spend 30$ or so a week on gas. There
goes another 120$ a month. You're down to 730$. Food will roughly cost
you...40-50$ a week assuming you don't eat out every day and don't eat
ramen every day. There's another 200$ a month. You're down to 530$. I'm
not sure if you have to pat utilities or if it's included so I won't
guess.



Now smart people put roughly 50$-100$ a week away into a Savings
account "just in case" your car breaks down, the TV explodes/etc. That
leaves you with roughly 130$ a month extra. Now assuming your student
loan wasn't huge I'm going to guess you probably pay around 100 a
month, at least, for it.



Now remember this is a rough estimate since you said you make little
and have all the bills. This doesn't even put into thought if you
smoke, drink, go out for fun, or anything.



Even if you do wind up having 100-200$ a month extra a month, it's sure
better to use that on something important like dating or going out once
in a while, I'm going to assume you don't play every moment you're home.



I have to be somewhat close to the bills/how much you make because I am
roughly doing the same right now. Right now the economy doesn't allow
spending money on things like computers unless you make a decent amount
of money, which most people who play WoW or AoC (I'd say 16-24) will be
making roughly 400-600$ a week on average.
Malcolm
Malcolm Jun 20, 2008 at 11:06 am
None
None
+1 votes
None
Wow, that's quite the laundry list of wild assumptions, many of which are unfortunately incorrect, starting with the first. The fact of the matter is I don't make a lot of money and can still afford both the things that I need and a reasonable amount of the things that I want. I'm sorry you can't. L2manageyourfinances better? It's not the economy's fault.
Kaex
Kaex Jun 20, 2008 at 3:26 pm
None
None
+1 votes
None
Then please tell me how much you pay for rent, how much you pay for a car per month. I make 400$ per week working part-time while in college. I have an Acura RSX-S which I pay 250$ a month for. I pay 400 a month for rent. 200 a month for car insurance. 40-50$ a week for food. That is my expenses. That's 1,050$ a month in expenses. Leaving me with 550 a month left over. 100$ a week goes to the bank on average (which most smart people do, gotta love 8 grand in the bank at 20 and it's all MY money.) That leaves me with 150$ a month. I'd much rather spend it on going out than a new computer.

Sorry, I guess you are a nerd that doesn't go out. Also I doubt my assumptions aren't far off because the average college grade makes 20-30 grand a year, aka 400-600 a week. I also live in New Jersey so I know how much the cost of living is in New York. It's ok though I can't wait to hear your made up figures if you do post them.

Oh and before you call bs on 400$ a week part time, work as a Mason for 4 years. 22$ an hour with the guy I work with, which is 480 a week, roughly 80$ for taxes a week. I know my stuff.
Grillsaus
Grillsaus Jun 16, 2008 at 6:47 pm
None
None
+0 votes
None
Processor:
AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4800+, MMX, 3DNow ~2.4GHz
Memory: 2048MB RAM
Hard Drive: 75gig raptor 10k rpm
Video Card: Radeon X1950xtx
Sound Card: SB X-Fi Audio [8400]

Moust of my comps components is out of date by yrs, but still i manage to run AoC on max with shades off at prox 30fps. :)
too bad the game sux
       
Kaex
Kaex Jun 16, 2008 at 10:00 pm
None
None
+1 votes
None
See, the problem is a lot of people need to completely re-build a computer to run AoC because they still have AGP mobos/single core processors/etc. Noone wants to spend 800$+ when their system runs what they are using it for fine.
Godsmak
Godsmak Jun 17, 2008 at 10:48 am
None
None
+1 votes
None
If all you want to run is WoW and play all of the new games on low settings then thats your choice.

I enjoy have a blazing fast computer that can play anything I want on the highest. **** I figured out how to 2 box AoC :)
Opet
Opet Jun 17, 2008 at 4:48 pm
None
None
+2 votes
None
My PC is 18 months old and cost 600 pounds to build and ran AoC fine o.O
Malcolm
Malcolm Jun 20, 2008 at 11:15 am
None
None
+1 votes
None
"See, the problem is a lot of people need to completely re-build a
computer to run AoC because they still have AGP mobos/single core
processors/etc. Noone wants to spend 800$+ when their system runs what
they are using it for fine."

You will only need to re-build a computer if your computer sucked when WoW first came out and you still haven't bothered to upgrade because all you've been using it for is World of Warcraft. And that's the problem. WoW permits players to continue to use outdated machines to play a currently popular title because it doesn't take advantage of ANY of the recent advances in technology. Now that people are desperately seeking to jump ship they have nowhere to go because their old machines can't handle *any* new games (not just AoC).

I can see from dealing with friends in WoW over the past three years that this represents a very large segment of the population, and it likely has a lot to do with why WoW has the staying power that it does--people simply have nowhere else to go. The inevitable truth about technology is that it will continue to change and continue to improve, and that holds especially true for computers. You can't expect your 6-year-old machine to be able to play modern titles. Like any hobby, PC gaming requires a hefty investment of disposable income.
Masta
Masta Jun 17, 2008 at 7:54 pm
None
None
+2 votes
None
My comp is 2½-3 years old, X2 4200+, 2 gig DDR400 RAM, a couple old SATA2 harddrives.. only thing that is relatively new at 7ish months is the geforce 8800gt, which is so cheap now a days that it's almost free, so I call BS on your BS. Game runs fine at high settings on this rig.
Uber new rig needed. Not at all. In fact I'll go right out and build you a PC at like 500$ that'll run this game any day of the week.
Kaex
Kaex Jun 18, 2008 at 10:34 am
None
None
+1 votes
None
Would you like a pat on the back or a cupcake? I'm sure you are feeling some sense of accomplishment.
J Benji
J Benji Jun 18, 2008 at 11:27 am
None
None
+1 votes
None
Most games thesedays require a decent comp. If the only game you run on your system is WoW, you shouldn't call yourself a gamer.

Personally, my 10 month old comp, runs AoC (and everything else I play) at max specs with no lag. I enjoy gaming, and it makes sense to put money into something I enjoy.

If you're happy just sitting in a corner with WoW, go ahead and enjoy yourself, just remember you are a casual gamer.

Thats another thing about alot of WoW player I meet, they think they are pro gamers simply because they broke x rating or beat y boss in WoW, yet when a new game comes out, insted of being open and trying it to see if they enjoy it, they remain closed minded and either not buy the game and slag it off whenver they can (with added claims that they purchased it and hated it) or they actually DID buy it, but went in with a negative attitude.

Buy the games and try them out. If the majority of people aren't playing it, who cares! If you're having fun, its money well spent, if you aren't, move along. If you honestly cannot afford to buy all these new games when they are released, go get yourself a job before becoming a self proclaimed expert on all things gaming.
Kaex
Kaex Jun 18, 2008 at 5:21 pm
None
None
+1 votes
None
If the only game you run on your system is WoW, you shouldn't call yourself a gamer.

So I don't play AoC, so I'm not a gamer. Ok.


If you're happy just sitting in a corner with WoW, go ahead and enjoy yourself, just remember you are a casual gamer.


If you're happy just sitting in a corner with AoC, go ahead and enjoy yourself, just remember you are a casual gamer. See what I did there?

And WoW is the ONLY game I play or have ever played. Yup.
Masta
Masta Jun 18, 2008 at 2:37 pm
None
None
+1 votes
None
No, I would however like it if you ever posted anything that made sense, was based in fact, was based on personal experience or in general wasn't just crap :) Did that do it for you?
Kaex
Kaex Jun 18, 2008 at 5:13 pm
None
None
+0 votes
None
briyan
briyan Jun 18, 2008 at 5:01 pm
None
None
+1 votes
None
Cupcakes abound on my blog header image!  Pick your favorite variety!
Kyle P.
Kyle P. Jun 16, 2008 at 2:37 pm
None
None
+4 votes
None
Did you know that 66.73% of charts and statistics are made up on the spot?

Source or it didn't happen.
briyan
briyan Jun 16, 2008 at 2:45 pm
None
None
-1 votes
None
Kyle, you know as well as I do that sources are not as important as the FACTS!  This is not Law & Order, we don't allow the guilty defendant to go free because the video of his crime was obtained illegally.
Kyle P.
Kyle P. Jun 16, 2008 at 2:49 pm
None
None
+3 votes
None
So I can safely assume your words can be taken on the same level as say; campaign promises during the presidential election?
briyan
briyan Jun 16, 2008 at 2:50 pm
None
None
-2 votes
None
Yes sir.  If you want an explanation, you'll have to wait a year, but you'll see I was telling the truth 100%.  I have to protect the identities of my operatives if I want to continue getting inside information to report to my loyal readers.