Create an Account
Forgot your Password?
World of Warcraft
WowRiot
Starcraft 2
Starfeeder
Hellforge
Hellforge
 
Machinima
Myndflame
Left 4 Dead
Left 4 Dead
RazeTheWorld
RazeTheWorld
 
Quake Live
Quake Life
1337pwn
1337pwn
Limit Break
Limit Break
 
Resident Evil
Resident Evil
Gameriot Store
Buy Games!
The Gameriot Store
 
 
 
POST STUFF
close
New Blog Post
Add a Video
Host an Image
Upload a File
by Roma Victor, Level 49
Last updated at May 19, 2008, 8:57 pm

1500's arena: soon to be the bloodiest, hardest fought, deadliest bracket imaginable.  World renowned arena champions, the best of the best, squaring off against each other in brutal combat to determine that all important question:

Whose PR will go up 15 points?

I don't typically blog about the same topic multiple days in a row, but this is too timely.  Bornakk was the sacrificial Blizzard rep who tried to explain, and justify, the 2.4.2 TR/PR changes today on the PVP forums:

Adjustments to your personal rating are based on the ratings by which the opposing team was queued:

  • If the opposing team was queued based on their team rating, your personal rating will be adjusted based on their team rating.
  • If the opposing team was queued based on their average personal rating, your personal rating will be adjusted based on their average personal rating.

 

Translation: your PR is at the mercy of how your opponent queued.

Example 1: Team A 2k TR/2k PR vs. Team B 2k TR/2k PR =
Team A's PR changes based on Team B's TR.

Example 2: Team A 1500 TR/1500 PR vs. Team B 2k TR/1500 PR
Team A's PR  changes based on Team B's PR.

As I pointed out yesterday, this is going to cause constant churn and thrash in the 1500's as reroll gladiator teams, PR sellers, teams adding new players and griefers get pitted against legit 1500 players. The legit 1500 players are going to get absolutely, 100% slaughtered.  The whole point of ELO was to prevent teams of unequal ability from playing each other- this is going to not only cause it, but promote it. I was actually hoping yesterday that this was just a mistake because Blizzard doesn't seem to understand algorithms. Nope, this abysmal change was by design.

PR selling will not be going away either. Win trading still works (due to the 150 PR -> TR range rule), but you can also PL it "legit" by dropping your average PR low enough to carry PR buyers against low rated teams.  Imagine a 2200 TR 5's team built for PR selling: Seller has 4 X 1500 PR + the buyer.  Average PR can be kept in the mid 1500's - low 1800's all the way up to 2050 PR for the buyer. The PR buyer will be getting up to 15 PR smashing legit low rated teams over and over. Until the sellers run into real competition, of course: other PR sellers! And hilarity ensues.

This is going to be extremely entertaining to watch.  I have to quote Bornakk here at the end because it's so apropos:

This change promotes having teams compete against players whose ratings statistically match up best against them. In turn this will help provide the most competitive environment possible in the Arena.

ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED!?!?!

Tags:
     
57 comments
clickertich
clickertich May 19, 2008 at 9:08 pm
None
None
+1 votes
None
yeah it's ridiculous. high rated teams are more tempted to simply level a new team and if they get queued against one with an artificially lowered rating thru PR, they'll probably split games, but the newly created team will take 25 per win
Pzychotix
Pzychotix May 19, 2008 at 9:11 pm
None
None
+1 votes
None
Hmm, I didn't think about 5s. Most of the wintrading PR sellers on my realms do it through 2s/3s just because of the number of people/boxes it takes.

Easy solution through wintrading:

Two teams of 2200+ 5s:
4 people on each team with 2200+ PR, 1 buyer at 1500 PR. Average TR is 2060. Straight wintrade to 2060 PR, and zero PR repairing requiring.
SKNeilyo
SKNeilyo May 19, 2008 at 9:14 pm
None
None
+3 votes
None
Well, arena has become a joke. Blizzard is slipping and going toward the path to it's own eventual doom. This isn't QQ, it's me stating facts, and people see this. I don't know what else to say because convincing Blizzard is a monumental task on its own. The only thing to do is really wait and see how WotLK will play out, but really, this waiting game is getting tiresome.

I don't know, that's my take on it. Roma you're slipping, 1500s are a level of play not a bracket, but good blog of course.
Favara
Favara May 19, 2008 at 9:25 pm
None
None
+1 votes
None
"and people see this" 

What people? Have you checked the general forum lately? There's like a 20-page long thread of ppl congratulating Blizzard on the new rules.
Pzychotix
Pzychotix May 19, 2008 at 9:31 pm
None
None
+1 votes
None
And there's an equal amount of people QQing on the forums about how they got stomped in the 1600s by 2k rated teams. It'll only get worse next season, since most high-rated players are abstaining from teamhopping at the moment to insure gladiator status.
Roma Victor
Roma Victor May 19, 2008 at 9:41 pm
None
None
+1 votes
None
It'll only get worse next season

I predict 1500 as the new 1800 for legit players new to arena, or for 1800 S3 players.  You're simply going to face too many teams that are far above your level of play as a legit low rated player to make any real progress unless you get really really lucky queueing.
Roma Victor
Roma Victor May 19, 2008 at 9:42 pm
None
None
+1 votes
None
Roma you're slipping, 1500s are a level of play not a bracket

Duty noted and self chastised.
Kawklee
Kawklee May 22, 2008 at 12:32 am
None
None
+1 votes
None
Duly noted*

Double chastisement?
Innate
Innate May 19, 2008 at 9:16 pm
None
None
+1 votes
None
i really wish they would just add a personal rating per bracket, that carried between teams. not only did the change make the life of "real 1500ers" a living hell, but I can no longer really play on more than one team per bracket unless i want to reroll/relevel pr twice or more a week, which isn't really realistic at the rate it goes up. part of the fun in arena was trying new combos instead of being stuck playing the same cookie cutter one week after week, but you're kinda screwed on that front unless you want to level your personal rating with 40 games per team per week. 
Rexall
Rexall May 19, 2008 at 9:19 pm
None
None
+2 votes
None
I made an account on Gameriot to tell you how much I enjoy this blog. The Life e-Casual is definitely the best blog on Gameriot, and pretty much the only reason I still come to this website. Good luck on the top blog contest, I see you're gaining ground on Starfeeder.

As for Arenas, yea, not looking good. I understand that Blizzard wanted to solve the point selling issue, while making it easier for fresh 70's to get into the arena game, but it seems it's all back-firing on them.
Roma Victor
Roma Victor May 19, 2008 at 9:43 pm
None
None
+1 votes
None
I made an account on Gameriot to tell you how much I enjoy this blog.

Thank you, I've enjoyed writing it so far.  Please show mercy to my poor casual arena teams if you're on Nightfail. Heh.
Mazud
Mazud May 19, 2008 at 9:42 pm
None
None
-3 votes
None
All you do is make stupid casual threads, about obvious stuff and then bump them with millions of your own comments. At least the stuff Ming makes up is somewhat Entertaining (and doesn't need to bump his own threads 100x). PLZ stop making threads.
Eddie
Eddie May 19, 2008 at 10:03 pm
None
None
+1 votes
None
Perhaps you do not like this blog Mazud because you are one of those semi(?)-professional arena players that dedicate 100% of their WoW time in the 2300 ratings together with some of the best players of your BG.

However this blog is directed to a more casual playerbase, that prefers to combine several aspects of the game with arena being a 10 game per week with some friends for a laugh and maybe some epics. Therefore it is more than understandable that all the "not so serious"-yet-embraced-by-many views of Roma Victor will not agree to yours.

On another note, being myself part this casual playerbase that prefers to PvP with relatives and friends I find this blog extremely interesting and like Rexxal I pretty much log to GR primarily to check this blog and after I have done that Jasi's and co. blogs.

Keep it up Victor, the topics you raise are always interesting or at the very least entetaining. What more can one ask?
treget
treget May 19, 2008 at 10:04 pm
None
None
+1 votes
None
Ming would probably explain how this PR change represents actual game play and has a direct correlation to his skill level all the while making up words that sound Chinese to prove his clearly asian background.

Then he would go into a 4 page blog about how his magical trips to china infuse him with true rogue skill.
sicstyle
sicstyle May 20, 2008 at 4:11 am
None
None
+1 votes
None
Obviously someone is forcing this poor man to read this blog at gunpoint. Roma, please, you MUST stop writing so that this poor soul will no longer be forced to read things in which he has no interest.
bife
bife May 20, 2008 at 10:12 am
None
None
+1 votes
None
the man clearly enjoys his naruto and homoerotic comments about golden children
Oozo
Oozo May 21, 2008 at 1:52 pm
None
None
+1 votes
None
Wow, Eddie.  That was a thoughtful and very polite reply.  Well done.  Here is my reply:

**** off, Mazud.
Solange
Solange May 19, 2008 at 10:10 pm
None
None
+1 votes
None
Either the designers have total freedom to do what they want (without serious oversight from top bosses), or, they JUST DON'T CARE. These issues are obvious and transparent, and did not need forum feedback or testing on the PTR. The blue posts are hilarious double-speak, so bizarre it seems like an SNL skit. I think they do know exactly how this will affect the casual arena players... they just can't be bothered. it'll all blow over, who cares if 5 ppl quit. Some dev got a headache trying to think of a real solution to wintrading and came up with this abortion, and there is goes live cause WHO AT BLIZZ GIVES A **** when WSG starts 3 horde vs 10 alliance, or 2v2 queues are 18 min for a year, or some noob gets 15 PR jacked by a gladiator.
treget
treget May 19, 2008 at 10:17 pm
None
None
+1 votes
None
I think it has a lot more to do with they have no clue what they are doing and instead of looking at other successful pvp games they are going to do it their way, good or nearly always entirely bad.
BEASTWOOD
BEASTWOOD May 19, 2008 at 10:22 pm
None
None
+2 votes
None
"If the average personal rating of the players queuing for a game is
more than 150 points below the team’s rating, the team will be queued
against an opponent matching or similar to the average personal rating."

One of the stupidest things Blizzard has ever done in this game.
demonen
demonen May 19, 2008 at 11:23 pm
None
None
+1 votes
None
It wouldn't have been that bad if they hadn't decided to replace "average personal rating" with "lowest personal rating"...
Zapatos
Zapatos May 20, 2008 at 12:38 am
None
None
+1 votes
None
I think your reasoning is not exactly right on PR selling. If a PR buyer is say 1800 and the other 4 people in the team are 1500 the average PR is 1560. So the PR adjustment on a win is based on a 1560 team. The 4 sellers will go up maybe 17-18PR but the buyer at 1800 will only gain 3-4, not 15+ because he is considered a 1800 player that just beat a 1560.
Roma Victor
Roma Victor May 20, 2008 at 6:05 am
None
None
+1 votes
None
I think your reasoning is not exactly right on PR selling. If a PR buyer is say 1800 and the other 4 people in the team are 1500 the average PR is 1560.

No, I'm assuming the sellers allow their average PR to climb to minimize the time it takes to level the buyer's PR. Presumably 4 2200 players can carry a buyer even in the low 1800's.  I ran into this personally where my 5's team hit a trifecta team with -- count them -- 4 glads and a shaman they were PLing in the mid 1700's. We got chainsawed and all of us are 5/5. It would have been no different in the 1800's- their level of coordination made us look silly.
blog vitals
A simple blog about the e-casual lifestyle, primarily as experienced in the World of Warcraft MMORPG.
44 Subscribers
comments61    Likes: 168    November 16, 2009, 3:32 pm
comments40    Likes: 58    September 30, 2009, 10:32 pm
comments20    Likes: 37    September 16, 2009, 10:25 am
comments34    Likes: 73    August 23, 2009, 9:15 am
Started March 25, 2008
120 Total Entries
THE SPOTLIGHT
Super Bowl, D.D. Reboot, Cap. America, H1N1 Pepsi
1 of 9
THE IMAGE FEED
332 images uploaded in the last 60 days. Got an image you need hosted?
Copyright ©2007-2010 GameRiot All Rights Reserved.