Create an Account
Forgot your Password?
World of Warcraft
WowRiot
Starcraft 2
Starfeeder
Hellforge
Hellforge
 
Machinima
Myndflame
Darkfall Online
Conquer Agon
Left 4 Dead
Left 4 Dead
 
RazeTheWorld
RazeTheWorld
Quake Live
Quake Life
1337pwn
1337pwn
 
Limit Break
Limit Break
REHorror
Horror Games
Gameriot Store
Buy Games!
The Gameriot Store
POST STUFF
close
New Blog Post
Add a Video
Host an Image
Upload a File
by Vhairi, Level 20
Last updated at June 4, 2008, 2:30 pm
Main Stats Site: http://vhairi.blogspot.com/

US Armory stats from a 1st June scan follow, in addition I have posted a comparison chart for each bracket.  While the main chart goes to 2400+(*) I have capped the comparison chart at 2300+ as things get a bit silly above that due to the small sample size, e.g. gains of over 700% in 2v2 for rogues at 2400+.

As you can see in the comparison charts things are shaking up a bit, especially in 2v2 and 3v3 where the large gains made by Rogues (and the popularity of double melee) has had a substantial impact on warlocks who continue to fall, actually below the target levels in 3v3 and 5v5, and just inside the target zone in 2v2.

Mages have also seen substantial gains in 2v2 and 3v3 (as a result of buffs, the increase in rogues, more people playing healer+ Mage or all 3?), but these gains have had only a small impact on their lackluster performance in 2v2.

Hunters continue to do poorly in all 3 brackets, a trend which has me somewhat baffled, a druid+hunter combination is not to be laughed at. (are all the druids taken by the warriors/rogues?)

In more general terms, in 3v3 the class performance is relatively unchanged until you get 2100+ where rogues, mages and Shamans see a boost.

5v5 continues a general trend of rogue and mage gains, and a fall for warlocks. The changes are less pronounced than the other brackets however and this may be in part because fewer people are as bothered about 5v5.

Enough of my waffling, the charts are pasted below.

(* I have included 2400+ as the top-end because while the sample size is still small, there are between 120 (3v3) and 232 (2v2) people with a PR at or above this rating and I decided this warranted inclusion for now)


2v2 Arena Performance

US 2v2 - 1st June 2008


2v2 Arena Comparison - 9th April to 1st June

US 2v2 Comparison - 1st June 2008


3v3 Arena Performance

US 3v3 - 1st June 2008


3v3 Arena Comparison - 9th April to 1st June

US 3v3 Comparison - 1st June 2008


5v5 Arena Performance

US 5v5 - 1st June 2008


5v5 Arena Comparison - 9th April to 1st June

US 5v5 Comparison - 1st June 2008

     
4 comments
treget
treget Jun 4, 2008 at 2:53 pm
None
None
+1 votes
None
7.8% for paladins in 2s! yes! NERF PALADINS NOW
Vhairi
Vhairi Jun 4, 2008 at 5:30 pm
None
None
+1 votes
None
Either:

1) People have lost interest in arenas

or

2) The stats are not of much interest

Either way I think it is safe to assume I can stop posting this stuff. :)
Drexciya
Drexciya Jun 5, 2008 at 3:51 am
None
None
+1 votes
None
Or people are starting to realize that warlocks were never that OP so they just keep their mouths shut and pretend like nothing.
teekala
teekala Jun 4, 2008 at 6:38 pm
None
None
+1 votes
None
druid-hunter is great but noones gonna play it for fun after they get their shoulders. It's unbelievable boring setup to play and gets only worse and worse higher the ratings you move. Then if you happen to face a mirror(at high ratings) be prepared to lose the last pieces of mental health you got left. Most frustrating **** ever.
blog vitals
Arena data analysis and stuff
1 Subscriber
comments32    Likes: 31    February 28, 2009, 7:25 am
comments4    Likes: 0    June 4, 2008, 2:30 pm
comments20    Likes: 0    June 2, 2008, 11:48 am
comments17    Likes: 0    May 18, 2008, 7:02 am
Started April 10, 2008
6 Total Entries
Copyright ©2007-2009 GameRiot All Rights Reserved.