|
by Accalon, Level 30
Last updated at October 26, 2008, 3:15 am
|
I recently went to that website to check how the warrior class is holding up with the new specs. In China, it looks like they have yet to receive a 3.0 (they are many months behind US/Euro i believe). There are 0 US warriors on the list, being 3-4 pre 3.0. Are the warrior specs that bad? Or do other classes just out dps, and out survive a warrior atm. We no longer have druids to carry us, because resto isnt viable, and resto shamans are scarce.  What is the future of MS warriors, and will the extra 10 talent points make a difference for us? I believe not....

20 comments
ARCTURAS Oct 26, 2008 at 3:31 am
-3 votes
NO DAWG WER SO OP JUST ASK MING
WARRIORS ARE OP IN 2'S EVEN THO THEY WERE ONLY VIABLE WITH DRUIDS
WARRIORS ARE OP IN 2'S EVEN THO THEY WERE ONLY VIABLE WITH DRUIDS
Hntar Oct 26, 2008 at 3:44 am
+1 votes
+1, the only arena-ing i can do is on my priest, and even then it's sketchy. if you're melee, forget about trying to stick to a target. it's a joke atm.
Horrible Oct 26, 2008 at 4:33 am
+1 votes
What are you talking about?
http://www.sk-gaming.com/arena/player/all/us/all/all/all/
There are plenty of warriors.
http://www.sk-gaming.com/arena/player/all/us/all/all/all/
There are plenty of warriors.
cydial Oct 26, 2008 at 2:06 pm
+2 votes
all the skill that warriors had xfered to retpaladins and arcmages
apatheticcoolguy Oct 26, 2008 at 4:21 pm
+1 votes
u realize there are only 8 american/european players on that list?
Druid
Priest
Hunter
Druid
Druid
Rogue
Druid
Priest
if we went by this, it'd compeltely go against every current complaining/crying whine going on out there. WHERE ARE THE RET PALADINS AND MAGES? WHY ARE THERE 5 HEALERS?
So mirroring ur logic, i come to the conclusion that mages and ret paladins are that bad cuz they aren't on that list post-3.0
Druid
Priest
Hunter
Druid
Druid
Rogue
Druid
Priest
if we went by this, it'd compeltely go against every current complaining/crying whine going on out there. WHERE ARE THE RET PALADINS AND MAGES? WHY ARE THERE 5 HEALERS?
So mirroring ur logic, i come to the conclusion that mages and ret paladins are that bad cuz they aren't on that list post-3.0
Prov Oct 26, 2008 at 5:38 pm
+1 votes
If there warrior representation has even gone down at all, it's due primarily to indirect reasons. With damage having greatly outscaled healing (and likewise, 2dps comps becoming much more prevelent), and warriors almost always pairing with healers, it's not surprising that they would be less represented as a result.
« Previous |
1 |
Next » |



Your Comment is being posted. Please wait...