
99 comments
Unethical Nov 6, 2007 at 12:09 pm
+3 votes
i hope the war was using that TF to buff the oomkin's dps
Moonreaver Nov 6, 2007 at 9:03 pm
+2 votes
He obviously was using it for the kewl WW animation. Id do it
Kilyn Nov 6, 2007 at 12:19 pm
+2 votes
I really dig the style of your videos, and your UI is amazing. I just got into arena PvP on my rogue and am going to start following your blog. Cheers.
Camelvendor Nov 6, 2007 at 3:52 pm
+3 votes
Song isn't Chemical Brothers btw Raelz, it's Dust Brothers
Sykness Nov 6, 2007 at 4:30 pm
+0 votes
whats the mod that says Ready to mutilate?? been looking for something like that.
Dwarfhitman-Uther Nov 6, 2007 at 6:36 pm
+1 votes
Oh hey I'm internet famous now.  In any event Hectorius is my alt paladin for a team filled with half alts. Your team accused us of bugging out the arena in a way I personally have never even heard of happening before (lol). Still a pretty lol event though.
Novos Nov 6, 2007 at 8:05 pm
+2 votes
FYI, I don't think anyone was accusing you guys of bugging the arena. Thought that would have been clear from the conversation I had with your priest while we were stuck in there. =/
Dwarfhitman-Uther Nov 6, 2007 at 8:18 pm
+2 votes
That did not seem to be the case, especially after Raeli's own e-gangsta yells.  Is your mage using tweaked viewdistance to grab targets as he loads...? He spots dyani in the first few seconds of the prep. Unless it's cool to put moonkin on ignore macros because they're so dangerous.
Novos Nov 6, 2007 at 8:29 pm
+1 votes
Not sure what you mean with our mage and getting your druid targeted early? But I thought most people would know by now that anything Raeli says in /yell isn't generally meant to be taken 100% seriously.
Dwarfhitman-Uther Nov 6, 2007 at 8:35 pm
+2 votes
I have not gotten to know Raeli that well so that may be the problem, outside of the movies. Every time we've faced one of his teams (like 2s for example) he/she wasn't playing on it.
raeli Nov 6, 2007 at 10:54 pm
+1 votes
@Nedd: Him > Me? Did you WATCH the video? 
@Dwarfhitman: Hi. You talked ****, you lost. Three times. Lol! The second 2 games we swept your ass even with me playing sloppy because I was tired.
I never accused you of bugging out the game, but as you can imagine I was really ******* frustrated from having to deal with the three following events in rapid succession:
1. Spamming my healthstone while getting Icelance Moonfire spammed, and not getting the heal without the GCD being up (you saw how i died in the first game, I was rooted out of range of anything, no way to get GCD)
2. Arena crash and sitting in place for 35 minutes.
3. Dumb ******* GM and not getting points for what became a 45 minute arena game for me and still needing to play more to get people points.
So of course I was frustrated. I was having a bit of nerd rage, but when you talked **** back after getting facestomped 3 times? It's kind of cute. It's like saying "O YA WELL WE LOST BUT UR STILL BAD".
The only reason I can't get that team up is the lack of 15 point games. We're aiming for a nice mid 2100s-low 2200s, but we're running out of time and teams I know we can beat (cough every 2345 in the top 30) refuse to queue. We've gone as far as to face a top team, win 22 points and then they stopped queuing straight out.
As for the comment on me not playing on my teams- I used to be on pools closed as a full time member. Stoped caring about 3v3 and focused on 2v2. Left my 2v2 to play Rogue/Rogue w/ Revak. Joined it back, played Rogue/Warlock at 2200 and had a rough streak. Remmie and Flabbersonia leveled it back to 2059 in the week I quit the game.
I came back from my little emo quit, decided I would play Rogue/Druid (with the condition that "if we lost 2 games we'd stop playing) and went undefeated that week, then the next and the next.
So yeah, taking shots at me for 'not playing on my teams' doesn't really work, tbh.
Either way, good games sortof. lol
@Dwarfhitman: Hi. You talked ****, you lost. Three times. Lol! The second 2 games we swept your ass even with me playing sloppy because I was tired.
I never accused you of bugging out the game, but as you can imagine I was really ******* frustrated from having to deal with the three following events in rapid succession:
1. Spamming my healthstone while getting Icelance Moonfire spammed, and not getting the heal without the GCD being up (you saw how i died in the first game, I was rooted out of range of anything, no way to get GCD)
2. Arena crash and sitting in place for 35 minutes.
3. Dumb ******* GM and not getting points for what became a 45 minute arena game for me and still needing to play more to get people points.
So of course I was frustrated. I was having a bit of nerd rage, but when you talked **** back after getting facestomped 3 times? It's kind of cute. It's like saying "O YA WELL WE LOST BUT UR STILL BAD".
The only reason I can't get that team up is the lack of 15 point games. We're aiming for a nice mid 2100s-low 2200s, but we're running out of time and teams I know we can beat (cough every 2345 in the top 30) refuse to queue. We've gone as far as to face a top team, win 22 points and then they stopped queuing straight out.
As for the comment on me not playing on my teams- I used to be on pools closed as a full time member. Stoped caring about 3v3 and focused on 2v2. Left my 2v2 to play Rogue/Rogue w/ Revak. Joined it back, played Rogue/Warlock at 2200 and had a rough streak. Remmie and Flabbersonia leveled it back to 2059 in the week I quit the game.
I came back from my little emo quit, decided I would play Rogue/Druid (with the condition that "if we lost 2 games we'd stop playing) and went undefeated that week, then the next and the next.
So yeah, taking shots at me for 'not playing on my teams' doesn't really work, tbh.
Either way, good games sortof. lol
Dwarfhitman-Uther Nov 6, 2007 at 11:21 pm
+0 votes
Dunno why you'd argue so much about 2s. Judging from your rating you bring them down more than anything.  We've always faced the nonraelie comp and it's a decent team, it's nice of them to help you get glad though. It can be so toughino
raeli Nov 6, 2007 at 11:25 pm
+1 votes
tough like winning 5v5 against a team with a holy priest playing his offspec for 5v5 and a 8k hp 200 resil frost mage imo
Novos Nov 6, 2007 at 11:25 pm
+2 votes
Having to say this over and over is getting annoying, but the majority of Raeli's losses came from him playing with the lock on the team. All of 2100 - 2300 was done with myself and Raeli during which time we lost one or two games only. If the team were only myself and Raeli both of our win percentages would be alot better.
Dyani Nov 13, 2007 at 4:38 am
+1 votes
So I'm the balance druid on Big Mac (moonkin lawl) and the only thing about this post that bothers me is your incorrect notion that you were 'moonfire spammed' to death in our first meeting. That is completely incorrect and I take great offense to your heinous accusation! Spamming moonfire is not something I do unless I have any other use for the global cool down and I also have the mana to burn. You were in fact killed by a starfire quickly followed by a moonfire this combo delivered something like 4-5k damage and might explain your heath stone 'not going off'. Once again I am Dyani a 2100 5v5 Moonkin and I do not! Spam! *******! Moonfire! btw keep poking holes in DH's ego he needs it and please try harder because your attempt at doing so seems to have done the opposite.
ps we don't have a mage so no icelances...
ps we don't have a mage so no icelances...
Nedd Nov 7, 2007 at 1:37 am
+0 votes
I did watch the video. I've also played with and against enough to know that he's possibly the best alliance rogue on the battlegroup. Unfortunately, I've never come across Skizzik, "the best rogue on the battlegroup" according to people I know that have gone against him.
raeli Nov 7, 2007 at 2:41 am
+1 votes
Apparently he's like a machine. I've only got thrown in a 2v2 skirmish WITH him, and he's good.
Others who know me pretty well and others who don't like me have both said that I'm about as good as him, so I dunno. I'm just working on consistency.
Others who know me pretty well and others who don't like me have both said that I'm about as good as him, so I dunno. I'm just working on consistency.
Nedd Nov 7, 2007 at 1:09 pm
+1 votes
Wait people have said you're as good as Skizzik? Dwarf must be the best alliance rogue on the battlegroup then.
raeli Nov 7, 2007 at 1:21 pm
+1 votes
Lol?
Or he could just be "generic mace rogue #2392939" who talks **** on the gameriot. If Season 2 was going on just a bit longer it'd be pretty easy to get ratings even better than his. At the moment I'm having trouble getting people on and motivated though.
EDIT: Plus I sure hope he's better at rogue than he is paladin.
Or he could just be "generic mace rogue #2392939" who talks **** on the gameriot. If Season 2 was going on just a bit longer it'd be pretty easy to get ratings even better than his. At the moment I'm having trouble getting people on and motivated though.
EDIT: Plus I sure hope he's better at rogue than he is paladin.
Nedd Nov 7, 2007 at 2:13 pm
+1 votes
Must be hard to get to 2300 with a warlock druid and warrior on your 2s huh? Try to do priest/rogue as he has all season constantly coming up against war/druid every time they made progress. Plus I'm not saying he's the best rogue on the battlegroup just best alliance rogue. My boy Penarr is the best rogue on the battlegroup =)
raeli Nov 7, 2007 at 2:22 pm
+1 votes
http://www.wowarmory.com/team-info.xml?r=Uther&ts=2&t=Hide and Seek&select=Hide and Seek
Too bad me and novos have beat this team.
GUESS HE'S NOT THE BEST.
(PS: it's a lot harder to beat lock druid as Rogue/Druid than it is Rogue/Dwarf Priest, grats on having ez mode against a LOT of the combos.)
Too bad me and novos have beat this team.
GUESS HE'S NOT THE BEST.
(PS: it's a lot harder to beat lock druid as Rogue/Druid than it is Rogue/Dwarf Priest, grats on having ez mode against a LOT of the combos.)
Nedd Nov 7, 2007 at 2:29 pm
+0 votes
From Dwarfhitman not 10 posts ago,
"We've always faced the nonraelie comp and it's a decent team, it's nice of them to help you get glad though."
"We've always faced the nonraelie comp and it's a decent team, it's nice of them to help you get glad though."
raeli Nov 7, 2007 at 2:33 pm
+1 votes
He must not remember, but I'm PRETTY sure he's the only Rogue/Priest in Whirlwind where both members are dwarves and is above 2300 rating.. but I'll just let Geekboys arena solve this for us, eh?
http://www.geekboys.org/arena/index/2/all/rogue/38/all/
Hmm.
HMMMM.
HHHHHMMMMMMMMMMMMM :|
http://www.geekboys.org/arena/index/2/all/rogue/38/all/
Hmm.
HMMMM.
HHHHHMMMMMMMMMMMMM :|
Novos Nov 7, 2007 at 2:38 pm
+2 votes
iirc we got 20-something points from them too.
Made for a nice finish to the night.
Made for a nice finish to the night.
Nedd Nov 7, 2007 at 2:43 pm
+1 votes
Can't say what happened as I'm not Dwarf but judging from playing with/against him and watching you're videos I'd stick with the Dwarf > Raeli claim.
raeli Nov 7, 2007 at 2:49 pm
+1 votes
If you want to continue to state that claim in spite of evidence that it's not true, feel free.
raeli Nov 7, 2007 at 3:25 pm
+1 votes
I've beaten both his paladin and his rogue.
That's not evidence enough?
That's not evidence enough?
Hilmo Nov 7, 2007 at 5:38 pm
+1 votes
sooo yea raeli I hate to say this bud but "claims" of beating his rogue and lower ratings make it hard to believe your better...
raeli Nov 7, 2007 at 11:22 pm
+1 votes
I've beat him.
And, lower ratings? His played in 5s is pathetic, my 3s isn't low due to not being able to progress further (we've only lost 2 5-6 point games) and his 2s is a whole 36 rating higher despite having a superior racial and superior racial for his partner.
And, lower ratings? His played in 5s is pathetic, my 3s isn't low due to not being able to progress further (we've only lost 2 5-6 point games) and his 2s is a whole 36 rating higher despite having a superior racial and superior racial for his partner.
Nedd Nov 8, 2007 at 12:28 am
+1 votes
And you run rogue/druid in 2s and are still behind him. At least he hasn't caved for the 4 dps team with his rogue, and held his own in a high level 3 dps 5s setup.
raeli Nov 8, 2007 at 12:56 am
+1 votes
By held his own, you mean 46 games and a 80% win rate (lowest on the team?)
Caved for a 4 DPS team?
I played with my friends, trying to get 3 of my friends who normally wouldn't glad.
Just happened to work out that way.
Caved for a 4 DPS team?
I played with my friends, trying to get 3 of my friends who normally wouldn't glad.
Just happened to work out that way.
Nedd Nov 8, 2007 at 1:33 am
+1 votes
And you have a 78% win percentage in 5s. And you have a 62% win percentage in 2s whereas he has an 80% win percentage. Is this evidence mounting up yet?
raeli Nov 8, 2007 at 2:14 am
+1 votes
I have a 78% win percentage because I've played in EVERY SINGLE GAME, unlike Dwarf.
Probably didn't help that we tried that Boomkin without even seeing if he was good in duels or anything. Oh well, you live, you learn, you get another warlock. >>
I mean, let's be honest here. What's better? 80% win percentage (lowest on team) with least games played on team, or 78% win percentage with most?
In other words, lol @ you nedd
try harder, because your failure is amusing
Probably didn't help that we tried that Boomkin without even seeing if he was good in duels or anything. Oh well, you live, you learn, you get another warlock. >>
I mean, let's be honest here. What's better? 80% win percentage (lowest on team) with least games played on team, or 78% win percentage with most?
In other words, lol @ you nedd
try harder, because your failure is amusing
Nedd Nov 8, 2007 at 3:47 am
+1 votes
Umm, I'd definitely take 80% over 78% regardless of the amount of games played. I'd especially take 80% over 78% if it's 80% in the 2100-2200 bracket only compared to yours being from start to 2100 or whatever you're at. Are you a woman irl? You must be if you're that dense.
Dmm Nov 9, 2007 at 1:44 am


Your Comment is being posted. Please wait...