Create an Account
Forgot your Password?
World of Warcraft
WowRiot
Starcraft 2
Starfeeder
Hellforge
Hellforge
 
Machinima
Myndflame
Left 4 Dead
Left 4 Dead
RazeTheWorld
RazeTheWorld
 
Quake Live
Quake Life
1337pwn
1337pwn
Limit Break
Limit Break
 
Resident Evil
Resident Evil
Gameriot Store
Buy Games!
The Gameriot Store
 
 
 
POST STUFF
close
New Blog Post
Add a Video
Host an Image
Upload a File
by Ming, Level 68
Last updated at March 19, 2008, 12:41 am
Like many others, I been having a blast playing the TTR.  For the first time ever in TBC I actually have full PVE gear to work with, the result?  2150 AP before trinket/mongoose, 30% crit, 80 hit rating and 220 resilience.  Let's just say my character feels a LOT more powerful in S2/T5 than S3.  With expose armor up, thanks to the two piece T5 bonus, shadowstep, improved eviscerate and dirty deed, I am getting non-crit evis's for 2000+ easily.  With trinket/mongoose activation I hit 2600+ AP easily unbuffed, and against S2 characters it is almost . . . unfair.

The armor penetration stat on S3 gear is a joke for rogues.  Against warlocks improved expose armor already bring them to zero (although if your name is Glickz, you get 3800+ armor unbuffed but even then with serrated blades, he is still very close to 0 once exposed).  Against any other class, S2 to S3 saw a significant increase in armor value across the board, so you don't gain any damage at all via armor penetration.  I played some rogue/rogue with both rogues at 2150+ AP and it was the best fun I had in a long time.  Instant 2v2 queues makes the bracket so much more fun to play, and with druid survivability nerfs it should make double DPS much more viable, especially with a human rogue.

Which brings me to my next question after reading Radikal's latest article:  How many people would be satisfied playing only the TTR module of the game for $15 a month?  I hate honor/badge grinding as much as anyone, I actually enjoyed raiding to a degree except I just can't fit it into my schedule, but even then I still enjoy the social aspect of having a main character.  Let's face it, this blog as the epitome of professional journalism, my hokage title acknowledged by every rogue under the sun, my relationship of love and harmony with Serennia, none of it would have existed if Ming the rogue character never existed.  We cherish characters like Neilyo-kun and remember him as the angry Undead rogue hero, I really don't believe Neil Mosunic playing 3-4 different characters would have brought him anywhere near the e-fame he has today. 

Not exactly the attitude SK wants:



TTR is an amazing idea that will certainly keep players coming back for more, but by itself, it won't sustain 10 million subscribers.  I am as loyal to the rogue community as I am to my significant other.  Even with the lure of creating fully equipped characters from other classes in minutes, I couldn't betray my way of the ninja.   I would never play another class on live because I obviously want to spend my very limited playing time on improving the character that made me who I am today, but even with zero consequences, I didn't feel like trying out other classes.  Maybe I am old fashioned, but I just can't see WOW in the same light as say, Street Fighter 2 where you just pick whatever character you like.  There is a level of attachment, a spiritual bond I must form with my character before I can really enjoy playing it.  A pure PVP game will never, ever have anywhere near the impact and commercial success WOW has today.  Not even Starcraft 2 will come close to the cash machine Blizzard built.

Finally, A Video Every Whitie Should Watch:


     
267 comments
campbell
campbell Mar 19, 2008 at 7:08 am
None
None
+1 votes
None
I watched that video, and from my point of view ( being Scottish ) it was really funny. I wonder if the person making the video just forgot about Wales or just didn't even know about them in the first place. Though surely if your making that sort of video you should get your facts straight.

And saying that Scotland can't get independence is wholly untrue. In fact a referendum is widely expected within the next few years. The question is whether or not we WANT to be. Obviously a decision Tibet isn't allowed to make.
themrchook
themrchook Mar 19, 2008 at 7:09 am
None
None
+4 votes
None
did ming just try, on a public website, to justify the invasion and control of Tibet by the Chinese government just because it was part of the country beforehand?
yumen
yumen Mar 19, 2008 at 7:21 am
None
None
+0 votes
None
Solmyr
Solmyr Mar 19, 2008 at 7:40 am
None
None
-1 votes
None
I'd like to point out that anyone who truly cares about Tibet is a hippie.
Zathras
Zathras Mar 19, 2008 at 7:54 am
None
None
+1 votes
None
Whities? Does that count as racism? Tibet? I thought this was a gaming blog?
firelo
firelo Mar 19, 2008 at 8:13 am
None
None
+0 votes
None
The_Cape
The_Cape Mar 19, 2008 at 9:12 am
None
None
+2 votes
None
 @Ming

I'm more than a little offended by the "whitie"(spelled whitey) comment, I am white. Commanche Indian/German/Irish to be exact, and I resent your comment of race. I read your post daily, enjoy the technical topics and info on my favorite players. Not sure why a word with racial implications should be used in your article. This is a game, nothing more, nothing less!
I would appreciate an apology for you racist comment, for I am white and have done nothing but support your blog both by reading and responding to it.

please remove me from your friends list.
Godsmak
Godsmak Mar 19, 2008 at 11:51 am
None
None
+1 votes
None
Zhero
Zhero Mar 19, 2008 at 9:19 am
None
None
-1 votes
None
"whitie" is just a word. Nothing more, nothing less. If you get that easily offended, I wish you the best of luck in life.
Reportmyname
Reportmyname Mar 19, 2008 at 9:36 am
None
None
-4 votes
None
Nigg3r Nigg3r Nigg3r Nigg3r Nigg3r Nigg3r Nigg3r Nigg3r Nigg3r Nigg3r Nigg3r Nigg3r Nigg3r Nigg3r Nigg3r Nigg3r Nigg3r Nigg3r Nigg3r Nigg3r Nigg3r Nigg3r Nigg3r Nigg3r Nigg3r Nigg3r Nigg3r Nigg3r Nigg3r Nigg3r Nigg3r Nigg3r Nigg3r Nigg3r Nigg3r Nigg3r Nigg3r Nigg3r Nigg3r Nigg3r Nigg3r Nigg3r

It's cool guys, it's just a word.
The_Cape
The_Cape Mar 19, 2008 at 10:54 am
None
None
+0 votes
None
Words are words, true. It's the "context" of words that bear then weight, and his was used that way.
bruteMax
bruteMax Mar 19, 2008 at 9:20 am
None
None
+1 votes
None
lol, Ming, like the school kid that cobbled together that video, has a loose grasp on logic. I guess Ming is the equivalent of an inbred redneck (is that redundant?) in China.

Hmmm, the area now known as Tibet was part of China.... 500 years ago. lol, ok so that makes it ok to continue to murder people to keep Tibetans towing the Politburo's line. No internet for you! No, we don't want you to express yourself say the monkeys in the Politburo. We must do like our despot friends in Myanmar!

Y'know, it's funny. Ming knows WoW very well, but his grasp on reason and truth are weak. It's pathetic that an individual who is so proud of his murderous 3rd-world homeland doesn't back up his talk by living there. I guess the european colonies really are superior to the rural, impoverished  backwater that is China.
istealrice
istealrice Mar 19, 2008 at 4:25 pm
None
None
+0 votes
None
Congratulations on fitting your own description of Ming: "his grasp on reason and truth are weak" by stating that China's a "3rd-world homeland". Last time I checked, the year is 2008 and China is FAR from being a 3rd-world country. Please, learn to use the internet.
istealrice
istealrice Mar 19, 2008 at 8:52 pm
None
None
+0 votes
None
If you were better at reading comprehension you would have understood the following points:

"Countries are often loosely placed into five categories of development.
Each category includes the countries listed in their respective
article. The term "developing nation", aka third world, is not a label to assign a
specific, similar type of problem."

"Newly industrialized countries or NICs,
nations with economies more advanced and developed than those in the
developing world, but not yet with the full signs of a developed
country.NIC is a category between developed and developing countries, and it includes South Africa, Mexico, China, India, Brazil, Malaysia, the Philippines, Thailand and Turkey."
bruteMax
bruteMax Mar 19, 2008 at 6:25 pm
None
None
-1 votes
None
It is a 3rd world, back-water wasteland of a country.  How many hundreds of millions live in abject poverty in rural china, with no property rights to protect family farms as the communist state claims their land to feed 19th-century style industrial growth?  Rural chinese are the slaves that feed the orchestrated capitalism that the state has inflicted on its people.

Educate yourself before you type.
istealrice
istealrice Mar 19, 2008 at 8:49 pm
None
None
+0 votes
None
ahahahaha, Where did you get this senseless crap from? Last time I checked, coming from someone who has actually visited on numerous occasions unlike you, the hundreds of millions who you claim to live in abject poverty in rural china with no property rights own their own farms which aren't claimed by the government.

Educate yourself with primary sources who are credible before you type.
Fizzle
Fizzle Mar 20, 2008 at 1:51 am
None
None
-1 votes
None
China is most definitely economically and humanitarily a third world nation. It's PPP adjusted rank is 130th, thats way far from what would be considered a devoloped nation.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People's_Republic_of_China

In addition, China's quality of life index is only 60th:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quality-of-life_index

This is not what one would call very stellar...

Just think, in about 10 years China may be a first world nation.
Thrym
Thrym Mar 19, 2008 at 9:28 pm
None
None
+1 votes
None
Yeah... China's economy may be growing but the money is not used to enhance the living standards of the people. Call it whatever you want, but it does not change the fact that human rights are violated, political disidents are executed, and people are working thier ***** off for no money at all.
Jinla
Jinla Mar 20, 2008 at 1:07 am
None
None
+0 votes
None
China's economy is not sustainable, simple as that.
istealrice
istealrice Mar 20, 2008 at 5:01 pm
None
None
+0 votes
None
Nice argument without supporting facts, well done.
VoteHillary
VoteHillary Mar 19, 2008 at 9:33 am
None
None
-4 votes
None
Hillary doen't give a **** about Tibet.

Vote Hillary.
THE SPOTLIGHT
Pornstar Friday, Wal-mart vs. blacks, Fermi, NCAA
1 of 9
THE IMAGE FEED
255 images uploaded in the last 60 days. Got an image you need hosted?
Copyright ©2007-2010 GameRiot All Rights Reserved.