Well, yes there are some chaps who argue against Affirmative Action because they are racist, but my point was not really about the reasoning for general discontent with affirmative action but about how the institution itself should be improved. I never said race was not a part of the overall structure of what's going on, but simply pointed out that just as in my example blonde hair is connected, there are better ways to get to where you want to go than testing the blonde hair. As in this example, there are better ways to help the disadvantaged than checking their race; and these would be checking the signs of educational disadvantage.
I view Affirmative Action as racist because racism, in its simplest form, is a version of a particular logical fallacy; first, that members of a group are defined by the aggregate properties of a group (eg, all women are weak because on average women are weaker than men) and second, that race is the primary arbiter of a significant number of characteristics. This very firmly falls into the latter category; when you can not use race as a method of distinguishing between two groups, one shouldn't. No matter how ideologically appealing it seems. In a truly equal society, race only matters when discussing heart disease and skin cancer. That is where we should be striving to get to.
You just agreed with me o.O