I find it funny how you try to say the reason for that guys success is all because DKs are overpowered, ignoring the fact that Holy Paladins are just as much, if not more imbalanced and more than likely the biggest contributor to the teams success - you could replace the DK with a Rogue or Hunter and likely do close to as well, replacing the paladin with a shaman, priest or druid however would doom the team to the 1600s.

Why do you ignore this? Because you're a paladin.

Everything you do is because of skill, even at a time when holy paladins are the single best arena class.

 

What does that mean? That rogues lose 1v1 to DK's ... ?

How does that prove DK's are more powerful than Paladins?

Go take a look at the SK rankings and you'll see the paladin is just as much of a reason to a teams success as any DK is.

 

Dunno why people love to use the terms "hardcore" and "casual" when most of the people who would be effected by this content being hard still raid 3-4 days a week.  Try "subpar" instead of casual imo

 

Simple logic for simple minds I see.  Bombing residential areas=self defense.